Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 4,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm
(Decision #1, para.1) Decision #1 described Justice McLeod’s background based on an Agreed Statement of Facts. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Santillana, No. 06-1276 A sentence for using a firearm during, and in relation to, a drug trafficking offense is affirmed where: 1) defendant was not challenging the reasonableness of the sentence; and 2) the circuit court generally does not review a district court's decision not to depart downward, and no exception to that rule applied here. .. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
”[3] Opponents argue that because the primary function of cheerleading is not competition, it does not meet the qualifications of a sport.[4] The answer to this debate depends on your definition of a sport.[5] The NCAA, the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
The BBC declined to release the information, citing section 43(2) of the Freedom of Information Act that protects “commercial interests”. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
And the inquiry does not consist of “[t]rying to identify speech that would benefit a president politically. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:28 pm
The Court re-affirmed (para 43) the approach of its Advocate General in this case (and in La Quadrature du Net) that ‘activities’ in the sense of Art 1(3) cannot be interpreted as covering legislative measures under the derogation provision; to hold otherwise would deprive article 15 of any effect (following reasoning in Tele2/Watson) and Article 4(2) TEU does not disturb that conclusion (despite the Court’s reasoning in the first PNR case… [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
These areas are: (1) the scope of the definition of a dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; (2) cryptocurrencies; and (3) off-channel communications by broker-dealers. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
Generally, however, public employees may assert official immunity from suit arising from the performance of their (1) discretionary duties in (2) good faith as long as they are (3) acting within the scope of their authority. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Galligan, Jr., Admiralty in Nutshell, 194-99 (5th ed. 2005) 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
Take the case of a biomedical engineer, Mark, who earns $325,000 (taxable income) annually and is married to Casey, who does not work outside the home. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
" This Post proceeds as follows: 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
I agree with Baert that the case presents issues of national and public importance, including: 1. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Here are five unanswered questions from Ramos. 1. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm
Robinson Dep. 51:1–14. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm
Moreover, the closest analogy for Section 60506’s “based on” language is the “on the ground of” language of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which also does not include the “otherwise” language found to be so important in Inclusive Communities. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
” Id. at 43.Well . [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Of course, we lambastedthe Karl decision ourselves (and made Karl #1 in our inaugural worst decisions of the year post). [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
See Department of Justice Order 1200.1, Chapter 4-1, B.7.j, found at http://www.justice.gov/jmd/ps/chpt4-1.html (last accessed on March 30, 2012). [read post]
