Search for: "Eugene Volokh"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 8,662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 9:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) PennLive.com reports on this case, in which Talaag Elbayomy was accused of attacking a man who was marching in a Halloween parade (alongside a “zombie Pope”), and shouting “I am the prophet Mohammed, zombie from the dead” [UPDATE: and apparently carrying a sign that said "Muhammed of Islam" on one side and "only Muhammed can rape America"]. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:11 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So argued Kenneth M. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 11:44 am
UPDATE: Eugene Volokh writes: “Glenn: I wonder if the item that you quoted is really that telling an indictment of the article in The Nation. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
He's quoted First Amendment guru Eugene Volokh — one of the leading voices in free speech analysis and a strong defender of speech rights. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
In explaining the process of the legal system from trial court to the Big Bench, Eugene Volokh offered some perspective on how and why a case makes it to the Supreme Court in order to counter the misperception that the Supremes were there to straighten out injustice and bad decisions. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:47 pm
The following appears today (in slightly edited form) on the New York Times Subject to Debate website, along with contributions from Kenji Yoshino and Eugene Volokh:Today’s federal district court decision striking down California’s same-sex marriage ban may or may not be upheld on appeal. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:50 am
See Volokh, sup [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 5:03 pm
So far I've seen three legal blogs pick up on Senator Hillary Clinton's "Emoluments" problem if she's appointed to serve as Secretary of State: Adam B at DailyKos, Jack Balkin at Balkinzation, and Eugene Volokh at the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:58 am
Eugene Volokh thinks so. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:13 am
In an earlier post I used Eugene Volokh’s analytical method to discuss whether flashing headlights to warn oncoming drivers of a speed trap was constitutionally protected speech. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:13 pm
Eugene Volokh summarized the case as follows: "Court [r]ejects as '[a]bsurd' the sex crime (sexual contact with a child under 14) prosecution -- even in juvenile court -- of a 12- and a 13-year-old who had consensual sex with each other. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is City of Espanola v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:33 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is White v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
(Eugene Volokh) The St. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
(Eugene Volokh) Today’s NASA v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) There’s been much talk about the trial court decision in Mansour v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
(Eugene Volokh) So asks a Pajamas Media column by Prof. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
(Eugene Volokh) The better solution, we believe, is to treat knowing falsehoods as categorically constituting a First Amendment exception, with some limitations we note below. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
(Eugene Volokh) When are knowingly false statements of fact constitutionally unprotected? [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:11 pm
. [* * *] [10] See Eugene Volokh, Are Douglas Mackey's Memes Illegal? [read post]
