Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 3241 - 3260 of 4,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Veronika Gaertner
The program of harmonization and unification of conflicts of laws (“Rome I”–“Rome V” and more) obliges to describe the scope of each regulation. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm by John Bellinger
In a surprising development, less than a week after last Tuesday’s oral argument in Kiobel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:38 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Monday, March 5th, 2012: Sh*t Law Students Say Discrimination must be proved, not simply assumed - Troy Media (blog) Man in charge of BC justice reform says frustration is evident in system - Winnipeg Free Press Racist-joke judge initiates complaint against himself Judge unlikely to face removal for racist message about Obama Germany court dismisses smartphone suits between Apple and Samsung How a new lawsuit could… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:23 am by Editor Charlie
In other news from the Goolag, eWeek reports that “Street View in Germany may get a curve ball later in 2010. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 8:54 am by Zachary Spilman
The case involves an Army Private who participated in a gang initiation ceremony for another soldier in Germany in 2005. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 5:30 am by INFORRM
– Brian Cathcart Opinion: “The Sun has eroded British justice, fairness and freedom: now it is feeling the effects” – Julian Petley Media law academic articles round up, the past 6 months – Judith Townend Case Law: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll News: Cabinet Minister’s 17 year old son gets privacy injunction but not anonymity – Keith Mathieson News:… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
The jiplp weblog carries a crisp, clear account by Peter Jabaly of the US decision in Air-Freshner v Paul Getty and the limited utility of fair use defences in trade mark infringement proceedings. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is Advanced Aerofoil Technologies AG v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:59 am
When O104:H4 infections hit Germany, the first "vegetables of interest" were E. coli-contaminated organic cucumbers from Spain, revealed publicly before there was confirmation that the E. coli did not match the outbreak strain. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Even if the United Kingdom, and in its slipstream the Netherlands, seem to take a tough stance towards the Court, Belgium, Germany, and Austria seem to be opposed to curtail the Court’s supervisory role in human rights protection. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Even if the United Kingdom, and in its slipstream the Netherlands, seem to take a tough stance towards the Court, Belgium, Germany, and Austria seem to be opposed to curtail the Court’s supervisory role in human rights protection. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:30 pm by INFORRM
Media law academic Dr David Rolph looks at the decision, and the implications for Australia The recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) has raised the issue of expectations of privacy in public places. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:59 am by tracey
Flachglas Torgau GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany: (Case C-204/09);  [2012] WLR (D)  45 “The option given to member states pursuant to the first sentence of the second sub-paragraph of article 2(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2003/4/EC of not regarding ‘bodies or institutions acting in a … legislative capacity’ as ‘public authorities’ responsible for guaranteeing access to environmental information, could be… [read post]