Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 3241 - 3260 of 6,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2014, 4:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
”   In reliance on the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 1985 holding in Zuckerman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am by Andrew Delaney
Supreme Court set up a procedure in Anders v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 11:40 am by John C. Manoog III
The Issue in the Case Did the superior court properly grant summary judgment in favor of the insurance company on the grounds that an assault and battery exclusion in the tavern’s policy relieved the insurer from any duty to defend or indemnify the tavern? [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:11 am by Daniel E. Cummins
,  a criminal court case, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in a case of first impression that information retrieved from a vehicle's "event data recorder," more commonly known as the "black box," was admissible in a criminal court proceeding. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
Zoning Board of Appeals ("The defendant . . appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court sustaining in part the zoning appeal of the plaintiffs . . . in which the plaintiffs claimed that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the city of Meriden (board) improperly granted the defendant’s application for a use variance. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm by Ken Chan
Accordingly, the land escheated to the State of California.The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:55 am by Joy Waltemath
Giving a male general manager a chance to put before a jury his claim that he was terminated based on lobbying by a female human resources employee whose romantic and sexual advances he had repeatedly rebuffed, the appeals court vacated in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the employer (Velazquez-Perez v Developers Diversified Realty Corp, May 23, 2014, Kayatta, W). [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:04 pm by Thomas Kaufman
The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s decision earlier this month in Hall v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:06 am by Joy Waltemath
The court then granted summary judgment for the defendants, finding that the employee’s rights had not been violated because “the directive at issue permitted him to assign others to attend rather than attend himself. [read post]