Search for: "Guest v. State"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 4,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2010, 6:00 pm
Nafal v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
In this post, Jeremy allows occasional guest blogger Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP) to report on the appeal decision of this case, rendered by the Court of Appeal for England and Wales.* Is This Henley a Shirt or a Musician? [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
In August 2013, a writ challenging the constitutionality of the same MCX Bye Law Rule 15.22 was filed in the Madras High Court (Mary Roseline and Stephen v Geojit Comtrade). [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
In August 2013, a writ challenging the constitutionality of the same MCX Bye Law Rule 15.22 was filed in the Madras High Court (Mary Roseline and Stephen v Geojit Comtrade). [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 11:36 pm
The AmeriKat is the epitome ofplain packaing....Plain packaging has been a hot topic on the Kat this year, most recently with Guest Kat Niko's post on the topic here. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:59 pm
Sandoz and Sandoz v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am
Having lost at first instance, Birkenstock stated on appeal (before the Court of Appeal of the Hague) that the result in the Birkenstock v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 12:13 am
[(Holmes v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
Then came a helpful explanation by guest contributor Christian Schalk as to why both companies should be so keen on retaining their right to use the name. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
One could suggest that the Alice v CLS Bank Supreme Court decision also had an impact. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm
What the Supreme Court did in Ohio v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am
New Interpretation 303-5 states that “professional identity focuses on what it means to be a lawyer and the special obligations lawyers have to their clients and society. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
guest post, prompted by her work in a pending looted-art case; her prior, related posts are here and here)What judges think of their function and task undoubtedly informs their understanding of their power or jurisdiction.In a March 3d order denying reconsideration of her January 6th dismissal of the heirs' lawsuit in the Nazi-looted-art case of Grosz v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 2:28 pm
The Texas Supreme Court Lenz v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Parker v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
