Search for: "In Re Stevens"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 5,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2011, 2:48 am
These companies – and the companies alone – determine the premium price they’re going to charge auto insurance customers. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:30 pm
"You're fine when you're just a yappy little dog that can't bite. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:33 pm
Only because, as we're about to see, "profits" in law firm land have a special meaning, and that's why they're imperative. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:35 am
Rugani, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, on Monday, February 20, 2017 Tags: Attorneys’ fees, Charter & bylaws, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Forum selection, In re Trulia, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, New York, Settlements, Shareholder suits, State law The Corwin Effect: Stockholder Approval of M&A Transactions Posted by Steven M. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:03 am
[Update: Steven Harper is going to profile the leaders of the firm in his next few posts.] [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 7:15 am
"We're disappointed that these researchers did not share their results with us earlier," writes Tim Callan, "but we're happy to report that we have completely mitigated this attack. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:35 am
But without receiving the notice of infringement, they’re under no duty to act, and they’re within the safe harbor if the copyright holder subsequently asserts a claim against them.The content providers don’t like it, needless to say. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
” The Court re-listed the case a few times, suggesting a possible dissent from denial of certiorari or a summary reversal. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
If you’re a young driver, don’t drive when the other passengers are a distraction. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm
” The Court re-listed the case a few times, suggesting a possible dissent from denial of certiorari or a summary reversal. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
But the ABA quickly re-wrote the regulations to increase disclosure and close loopholes. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Pfizer (femoral stem) Deposition1998-08-31 In re AMS Minnesota Penile Prosthesis Litigation Deposition1998-08-31 In re Guidant Implantable Defibrillators PLL Deposition1998-09-09 Suerth v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am
Again, I’ll name the articles and even the pages (or “find”-able quotes) so others can look to the sources and reach perhaps other conclusions, if they're interested. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
John Paul Stevens very likely will retire. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
Stevens, an economics consultant, and Jeffery Y. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
Steven J. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
” Stevens said. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
., “we’re gonna have to go to their homes . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Hydraulic fracturing and its consequences are an important matter of public concern, and lies at the heart of the Court’s unanimous ruling in the case of In Re Steven Lipsky. [read post]
