Search for: "In re: Roger" Results 3241 - 3260 of 3,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2008, 7:58 am
Nor does being 68 years old mean that a former offender is less likely to do so again, Rogers says. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 7:24 am
Terry Rogers, Interim Public Defender; Donna D. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 7:24 am
Terry Rogers, Interim Public Defender; Donna D. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 8:01 am
–If you’re caught with your ethical pants down, you can ordinarily recover if you admit your mistake (and maybe go into rehab). [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:47 am
  If you're interested in who has standing to assert that a lawyer has a disqualifying conflict of interest, visit this page from Freivogel on Conflicts. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 10:42 am
  I’d say we’re kindred spirits in terms of the subjects covered. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:55 am
"Twenty years, unfortunately, doesn't really prove anything" as to whether they'll re-offend.Nor does being 68 years old mean that a former offender is less likely to do so again, Rogers says. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:45 pm
Kelly Siegler's minions aren't giving up, though; they're going door-to-door every weekend talking to the people, getting a favorable response from voters, many of whom don't know that anyone but Kelly is running. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:38 am
Prosecutors have a variety of options to punish people who stretch the truth and they're not afraid to use them. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:38 am
Prosecutors have a variety of options to punish people who stretch the truth and they're not afraid to use them. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 5:20 am
Some recent related posts: Should Roger Clemens now be indicted for perjury? [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 11:35 pm
And the only reason we had the hearing was because Roger Clemens and his lawyers insisted on it. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 11:53 am
The Final Rule that a broker attest attesting to reading and the letter that was sent by Roger Einerson, Asst Dir, Torts Branch to Leslie J. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 9:30 pm
And we're just not asking those questions. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:55 am
There again, the premise of your question is they're the very same documents. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 10:00 pm
  But if you're like me, there's never enough time to keep up. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 4:40 pm
For some great insight into the flurry of motions, check out Roger Parloff’s post on Legal Pad today. [read post]