Search for: "James v. State" Results 3241 - 3260 of 9,745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm by NL
Such absolute rules were not rare (James v UK App No 8793/79 para 47). [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm by NL
Such absolute rules were not rare (James v UK App No 8793/79 para 47). [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Coverage includes reports by Adam Liptak of The New York Times and Sidney Rosdeitcher and James J. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Cathy Reno
Heller applies to the states. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm by Brian Shiffrin
by James Eckert, Monroe County Assistant Public DefenderThe Court of Appeals, Fahey, J. writing for the court, held: "as a matter of state evidentiary law, that evidence of a defendant's selective silence generally may not be used by the People as part of their case-in-chief, either to allow the jury to infer the defendant's admission of guilt or to impeach the credibility of the defendant's version of events when the defendant has not testified. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Chief Cox designated Detectives Scott Alston, Michael McEwan and James Surdoval to perform such police patrol duties.* As a result, these detectives "work[ed] part of [their] normal work week, during [their] normal work hours, in uniform on patrol. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 8:19 pm
For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Kelley III, Truth or Consequences (the Deadly Kind): Oath Swearing in Nigerien Customary Law, 47 North Carolina Journal of International Law 331-370 (2022).Ethan Szumanski, The Future of the Freedom of Religion on State No-Aid Provisions: The Effect of Espinoza v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Vasileía tou Theoú, (South Dakota Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2020).Brian Owsley, Is The Supreme Court Irrational: Trump v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:06 am by David Oscar Markus
  Unfortunately, it cited my old case -- United States v. [read post]