Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 4,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 8:02 am
Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court in Sykes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:38 am
Justice Thomas concurred in the judgment. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in judgment. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:26 am
Those who like to track Justice agreement and label them by ideology should note the split -- Kennedy joined by Roberts, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor and joined in the judgment by Thomas. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:10 pm
Of particular interest, I believe the letter is signed by all of the Thomas, Scalia, Rehnquist and Kennedy clerks that Term who are not presently in government service (one Thomas clerk is a judge; a Rehnquist clerk is an AUSA; and a Kennedy clerk is a state SG).That’s very impressive support. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm
Writing for the Court, Justice Breyer, joined by Justices Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan, held that in such circumstances, the government must establish that there was a “reasonable likelihood” that a relevant communication would have been made to a federal officer, not just any law enforcement officer or any other person. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
. ___ (2011)) Justices Roberts (author), Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan; Breyer (author) and Ginsburg dissented. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
Justice Roberts delivered the opinion, which Justices Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagen joined. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
Alito, Jr., and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:41 am
Still, the views expressed by Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas may prompt litigants to take up Justice Scalia’s invitation to present an “appropriate case” for reconsideration. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:14 am
An ideologically unusual coalition of six justices (Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan) chose the middle-ground option. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:46 am
There were, nonetheless, some rather serious disagreements, which I'll attempt to explain and referee here. 1) Justice Scalia, writing for a five-justice majority (himself, CJ Roberts, and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito), also reached the merits of the claim. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
SEB S.A. (131 S.Ct. 458 (2010)) 8-1; Justices Alito (author), Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan; Kennedy dissented. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:29 am
Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:01 am
., Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
- At Concurring Opinions, Thomas Crocker considers Justice Alito’s use of the term “privacy” in his opinion for the Court in Kentucky v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:08 pm
An ideologically unusual coalition of six justices (Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan) chose the middle-ground option. [read post]
29 May 2011, 3:53 pm
Justice Kennedy, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented. [read post]
29 May 2011, 8:56 am
" Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Alito, Jr., Scalia and Thomas. [read post]
