Search for: "Land v. People" Results 3241 - 3260 of 4,713
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Land seizures in the People’s Republic of China: protecting property while encouraging economic development. 22 Pac. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am by Colin Murray
My constituents and many other people up and down the land are furious that once again the Government seem to be bending over to the human rights lobby to introduce a measure, which is frankly inappropriate to the balance of crime and justice in this country. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 12:03 am by Frank Cranmer
Neil Foster, Law and Religion Australia: The meaning of “sex” – in the UK and Australia: comparing and contrasting the judgments in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers and Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] FCA 960. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
Thus, when the Court refused Georgia's attempt to seize Cherokee lands (Wooster v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionThe Symposium raises two large themes, with many variations. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:07 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Vaughan, 82 So. 2d 890, 891 (Fla. 1955)(where contractor had not finished construction, contractor‟s liability for a hole left in the ground was exactly co-extensive with that of the possessor of the land); Worth v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 11:59 pm by Mark Savill
Full article can be found here Northwood Solihull Ltd v Fearn to be appealed The court case of Northwood Solihull ltd v Fearn has now been given leave to appeal. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 3:50 am by SHG
I mentioned this on the twitters and was told by a follower I respect that it went on to be inspirational, an exploration of human motivations and growth, greed v. fear v. life situations for people who had never been exposed to inhumanity. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am by Erin Miller
Hardwick, in which he disagreed with the Court’s acceptance of a criminal ban on homosexual conduct and emphasized “the abiding interest in individual liberty,” became the law of the land in Lawrence v. [read post]