Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 3241 - 3260 of 7,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The judgment issued by the First Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights(ECHR) on 25 November 2021 in case 77419/16 (Biancardi v Italy) increases the scope of the ‘right to be forgotten’. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 8:20 am by John J. Barnosky
  But speaketh they did, on April 17, 2025, in a lengthy opinion with a 13-page dissent to boot (Carlson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 10:38 am by Alexandra Allan
In NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NV v Cargill International SA (The Global Santosh) [2014] EWCA Civ 403 the Court of Appeal considered the true construction and application of a proviso to an off-hire clause dealing with the capture, seizure, detention or arrest of the vessel. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
Hood seemed hopelessly out of his element talking about, well, just about anything you would expect him to know about, but especially the Renfroe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:36 am by JURIST Staff
V Ramana at an event Saturday organized by the Karnataka State Bar Council to pay tribute to Late Mr. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:07 am by Richard M. Re
As part of my ongoing quest to discover under-appreciated jurisdictional issues, I'd like to return to the Court's recent decision in Town of Greece v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
At first instance, Floyd J held that the inventive concept lay in other parts of the product than the bottle and so replacing a bottle could not be 'making'. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:51 am
Chapter 5 lays out the copyright strategy implemented by the Church of Scientology.This book will be of interest to anyone interested in the intersection between copyright and religious texts, and in the concept of authorship more generally. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 12:20 am by Mark Summerfield
  However, a plurality of two judges (Middleton and Perram JJ) based their decision on a new two step test – first asking whether the claims are for a ‘computer-implemented invention’ and then whether that invention can ‘broadly be described as an advance in computer technology’ – while the third judge (Nicholas J) instead took a more conventional path, observing that the substance of the claimed invention lay in the mere computer implementation of… [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:27 am by JB
Justice Kennedy's opinion in Obergefell unceremoniously overrules Washington v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:04 am
| Google Books legal saga ends | s52 CPDA repeal comes into force 28 July 2016 | The latest Jack Wills v House of Fraser judgmentNever too late 93 [week ending on Sunday 24 April] - No UK judges in the UPC? [read post]