Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 3241 - 3260 of 8,594
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In a press release yesterday, First Liberty announced that a settlement has been reached in Walsh v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 2:28 pm
Thus just as they flouted Resolution 1.10 from the 1998 Lambeth Conference in 2003, when they approved the consecration of Bishop V. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
., 2008-07-31), 2008 CSC 47, SOQUIJ AZ-50505229, J.E. 2008-1506, [2008] 2 R.C.S. 675, a écarté l’approche purement mathématique que véhicule la version française de la disposition, dont le sens commun suggérait simplement de déterminer le nombre de déclarations de culpabilité requis par l’utilisation de l’expression «plusieurs déclarations de culpabilité». [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:52 am by pscamp01
Harlan was 26 years old at the time and young Harlan the slaveholder was quite a different man than Harlan the author of the Plessy v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 4:00 am by SHG
But if you want to know how we got to where we are now, KC Johnson and Stuart Taylor lay it out for you. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
PÉNAL (DROIT) — garanties fondamentales du processus pénal — droit d’être jugé dans un délai raisonnable — fraude — abus de confiance — plusieurs accusés — délai déraisonnable (41 mois) — application du cadre d’analyse de R. c. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
 If the Judiciary Act of 1789 and related legislation better explain the establishment and development of judicial review in the United States than Marbury v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Jessie Hill Mental Health and Other Behavioral Health Services - John V. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
  Andrew considered that Regeneron v Kymab [2016] EWHC 87 (Pat) represented the most technically difficult decision of the year, although he noted that Electromagnetic Geoservices v PGS would have run it pretty close had the case not settled. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
 This was - in a nutshell - the issue on which the Polish Supreme Court had sought guidance from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in OTK v SFP, C-367/15.This morning, contrary to the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston, the CJEU answered in the negative, holding that [para 28] "the fact that Directive 2004/48 does not entail an obligation on the Member States to provide for ‘punitive’ damages cannot be… [read post]