Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 82,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2005, 8:00 am
Orbanski; R. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:54 am
Whether one looks to God for the glory of the Union or not, the 9th Circuit decision in Newdow v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
-- Just like state immunity in international law does not protect a state from suit in respect of its commercial acts, the act of state doctrine likewise does not apply in relation to such acts (paras 92 et seq). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:29 am
Bankruptcy laws in Canada vary by province, somewhat like the US states differences. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:13 pm
Dear Readers:In US ex rel Rigsby v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm
Meanwhile, another federal appeals court that many observers have regarded as likely to rule in favor of upholding state bans on same-sex marriage — the U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:22 am
Stanford student John Dalton discusses last week’s oral argument in No. 08-5274, Dean v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:02 am
Of course, you could also come up with other hypothetical situations like the ones I mentioned above. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:46 pm
In Luis Castro-Ramirez v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
His judgment stated that “the harm caused by the repudiation of the promise is not the same as the detriment suffered. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 6:39 am
To use United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
In State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:02 pm
The court just ruled in Missouri v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 7:30 pm
[T]he sovereign immunity of a tribe, like the sovereign immunity of a State, does not extend to prevent the federal government from exercising its superior sovereign powers. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:35 am
Some lawyers maintain that it is always to the advantage of the plaintiff to litigate a claim in federal court for the following reasons. * The Federal Rules of Evidence typically are a bit more lenient, and therefore more favorable to a plaintiff than are the state rules of evidence. * The federal courtrooms are much grander and larger than the typical state courtrooms, and therefore juries are likely to be more impressed with a case brought in federal court and more… [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 2:18 pm
Some lawyers maintain that it is always to the advantage of the plaintiff to litigate a claim in federal court for the following reasons. * The Federal Rules of Evidence typically are a bit more lenient, and therefore more favorable to a plaintiff than are the state rules of evidence. * The federal courtrooms are much grander and larger than the typical state courtrooms, and therefore juries are likely to be more impressed with a case brought in federal court and more… [read post]
