Search for: "May v. Summers"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 4,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 5:11 pm
Focus Areas: Architecture and Public PolicyAttachments: ACA v Bonta stip. vol. dismissal.pdf [read post]
U.S. appeals court unlikely to grant Apple an injunction against Samsung over three software patents
4 Mar 2015, 8:00 pm
Should this change, then it may have to try again to obtain injunctions. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
Some may object that Sen. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 2:23 pm
This may be so in theory but what, asks the IPKat, do the judges have to say? [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:30 pm
According to the IPKat's calculations, we should be sure of a final ruling this summer. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:57 pm
TV Time was published from November 2004 through May 2005. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:35 am
ALJ Rules Union Steward May Use a Cell Phone to Secretly Record a Meeting with Management — via The Employment Brief Unions Protect Employees And Offensive Employee Conduct, And That’s How Unions Work — via Above the Law You Can’t Be Fired For a Facebook Post Calling Your Boss a “LOSER”—NLRB v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 9:31 am
TCL v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 4:29 am
Butler — from Walter Olson’s Overlawyered Your Summer Intern Is Here. [read post]
29 May 2023, 6:20 pm
" The extension was granted only in part, to May 30. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Summers v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:18 am
On two occasions, the majority opinion in CFPB v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:41 pm
Schedule I has the most severe sentencing range, with Schedule V the least. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
And of course in Bluman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:02 am
In the summer of 2006, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals invalidated the 2004 registration provision in Goldstein v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:18 am
In this case, the Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a ruling that opined the discretionary planning function immunity applied, which as noted in the 1988 Indiana Supreme Court case of Peavler v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 10:36 am
Siwek v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:18 am
Women can similarly wear dark jeans, chinos, or a summer dress, with flat shoes or boots, and a plain top or sweater with minimal jewelry. [read post]
