Search for: "Mays v. Paul"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 7,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm
Be that as it may, today’s decision is an important victory for advocates of same-sex marriage. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
Circuit Judge Paul J. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:25 pm
Related Cases: Rubin v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 6:42 pm
Jude Medical, Cardiology Div., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:43 am
Apparently, Dunnes’ assumed that Karen Millen’s designs were nothing but the combination of features drawn from a number of earlier designs, such as a grey Dolce & Gabana knit top and a Paul Smith blue striped shirt. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:56 am
The problem, from Judge Coleman’s perspective, is that it may not always be possible for a district judge to determine whether disclosure is necessary (as opposed to whether it “may be necessary”) without the benefit of adversarial presentation. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Under Employment Div. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
What the Chief Justice explained in the landmark Health-Care Cases (a/k/a NFIB v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:20 pm
Previously we noted, here and here, the First Circuit case of Kosilek v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 11:05 am
But the more likely scenario is that everybody will wait for the Supreme Court to hand down its ruling in Carter et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am
Paul Kelley, George Tazbaz, Roger D. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:16 am
In State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:44 pm
In this post, guest contributor Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP) explains the legal issues and their consequences:UKIPO -- a 'court' for the purposes of the Brussels I Regulation Some courts look like this ...With Actavis v Eli Lilly [noted on the IPKat here] still fresh in our minds, and amendments to the Brussels I Regulation (recast) progressing through the European Parliament in preparation for the Unified Patent Court, jurisdictional matters are a hot… [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
RSCAS 2014/58 (2014)).Paul T. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
” Later, in United States v. [read post]
