Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 1:05 am
Para 16 of the draft Declaration states “The Court provides an authoritative interpretation of the Convention, and a safeguard for individuals whose rights and freedoms are not secured at the national level”. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:05 pm
In Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 11:14 am
Link: Zachariasewycz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
”[10] The issue of “healing” is effectively discarded in R. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm
Akhtar v Boland [2014] EWCA Civ 943 Just a quick note on this one, after a conversation with a colleague reminded me I hadn’t written it up. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
§ 112 ¶ 1. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:59 am
Furthermore, para (a) starts by stating that the importing WTO Member shall use "either Chinese prices OR [the NME] methodology". [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 12:42 pm
In R. v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 4:04 am
It is not possible or desirable to provide any sort of exhaustive list, but the following examples illustrate the breadth of the concept: (1) A procedural irregularity or manifest unfairness which causes the decision of a Tribunal to be unjust. (2) A decision based on a finding of fact for which there is no supporting evidence (British Telecom v Sheridan [1990]… [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
R v Sargent, 2016 ABCA 104 [17] This Court has previously stated that smuggling drugs into a penal institution should be treated as an aggravating factor: R v Gargas, 2013 ABCA 245 (CanLII) at para 7. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 6:24 pm
The principle was clearly stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Machtinger v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
R (Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 5 Dec 2017. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 3:58 pm
First, the bar to summary judgment remains a high one: Lameman at para. 11. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Digital Rights, supra at ¶ 54.This is likely to be an important decision not just within the European Union but also may affect those entities and states that deal with or through Europe on these matters, and especially the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:29 pm
" Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:16 am
In this week’s case (Van Tent v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:16 pm
BLUE WATER PARTNERS, INC. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 1:53 am
It was provided in Mr Worrall's 1st Witness Statement (para 28) and his 2nd Witness Statement (Paras 31-35). [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
In today’s case (Tambosso v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:26 am
Yet, both the referring court and AG Bobek had doubts if this criterion would not require some kind of limit to prevent the publisher of an online article to be sued in all member states in which a person potentially affected in their national dignity might have their centre of interests. [read post]
