Search for: "People v David S." Results 3241 - 3260 of 5,861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2014, 11:55 am by David Gans
  Ten months ago, in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:34 am
” The essay, largely drawing upon the research of  Yale’s Dan Kahan and the Cultural Cognition Project, discussed how ideologically motivated reasoning affects the way individuals process information, provoked a substantial number of responses, including these from David Harsanyi and Will Wilkinson. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am by Alfred Brophy
  But even then I think it's informative of what people thought ought to be included on a list of the "black experience. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:31 pm by Lowell Brown
Momentum is strong in the wake of the court’s June 2013 decisions in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
” This broadly mirrored the case law, notably, R v Brent LBC, ex p. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
” This broadly mirrored the case law, notably, R v Brent LBC, ex p. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
  The judge notes that the affiant who submitted Attachment B is “Special Agent David Goldkopf of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
Wednesday’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Aereo The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm by Jason Rantanen
1) Give district courts discretion to punish frivolous suit 2) Forcing patent holders to be more clear in their claims in Biosig v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
David Byrne; White House; Al Jazeera have all used them. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Because if we think about 10 years ago v. today there’s been extraordinary progress. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm by Joey Fishkin
In yesterday’s big campaign finance case, McCutcheon v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:46 pm
It’s therefore not all that surprising that when the Supreme Court decided Buckley v. [read post]