Search for: "People v J." Results 3241 - 3260 of 7,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
Carpenter, supra.It went on to explain that the Fourth Amendment protects `[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures[.] [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 9 June 2016 there was a PTR in the case of Begg v BBC before Jay J. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Based not on borders for their own sake but for the policy reasons we have those boxes/want people to stay within them. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 2 June 2016, Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Barron v Vines ([2016] EWHC 1226 (QB)). [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Warby J applied these factors to the relevant facts. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm
" (Rubalcava, supra, 23 Cal.4th at p. 337 (conc. opn. of Werdegar, J.).) [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:14 pm by Peter Groves
Given that he is in the habit of painting on other people's canvasses, an activity which in the law's humourless way could be counted as criminal damage (though I doubt it would ever give rise to a complaint), that is a relevant point. [read post]
30 May 2016, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
And even though he would never fire a male employee based on attractiveness, this, somehow, is not sex discrimination.The Story of Her NightIn a recent case, Edwards v. [read post]