Search for: "People v Paine"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 3,323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2007, 5:25 am
Acuna v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 1:07 pm
See Whalen v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 11:00 am
Low cost, low risk, but enough interpersonal pain to make people not to turn to it unless the need was high. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:00 am
Some passengers reported neck and back pain from the impact of the train crash. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 6:32 pm
V. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 3:47 pm
People v Shirley (1982). [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 4:48 am
A tantalizing footnote in Rioux v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
It's an unfortunate fact of life that there are a lot of prescription drugs out there that people can also use to get high. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 11:21 pm
To borrow from Reyes v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 10:45 pm
This one hits close to home on so many points it is painful to write about. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
The bill (which was still in the envelope), “caused a stinging pain and a red mark on her left side of her face from her chin to her cheek. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:59 pm
" Alcala v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
O'HARA v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 11:10 pm
Supreme Court's holding, a year ago in Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 2:33 pm
Imagine that, the government steps in to give varying degrees of immunity and protections to tortfeasors, and people rush in to the protected palace of immunity. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
Now, lets do the rest of the painful tax math. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 2:38 am
On Thursday, in People v Garbutt, 2007 NY Slip Op 05972 the Third Department held that it is an error of constitutional (see NY Const, art I, § 2) and statutory (see CPL 270.35 [1]) dimension to substitute an alternate juror for a regular juror after deliberations have commenced, without first obtaining a defendant's written consent. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 4:34 am
J.R. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:33 am
I wrote about the California Supreme Court's decision in The Oakland Raiders v. [read post]
