Search for: "People v. James" Results 3241 - 3260 of 3,552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm by John Ross
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
What is the likely impact of a complaint on the person/people directly affected? [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:37 am by Jon Levitan and Andrew Hamm
She also released three opinions, including in one case, Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  A portion of the decision lamented the dearth of specifics offered by the People's Republic of China's State Secret Law with respect to determining whether information produced is protected and what liability would attach to that disclosure. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
We owe it to the children, young people and families in our communities to address these issues before it’s too late. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]