Search for: "People v. Sans"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 3,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2007, 11:58 am
Even in San Berdoo.Defendant makes a claim that Lawrence provides constitutional protection for the practice. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 1:37 pm
People miss "no" or "not. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 4:00 pm
District Court in San Jose last year. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 5:57 pm
In People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 11:03 am
For instance, if users deign to use a standard-issue CD player, they can simply burn a disc of their iTunes purchases and enjoy them sans iPod. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 11:58 am
" So saying, Wilder commented that _Romer v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:20 pm
He wrote in People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:45 pm
But you should read it even before I do.This is the "kangaroo court" case, which I previously discussed here and here, in which Judge Saiers seemed to call the California Court of Appeal a kangaroo court, and to which Justice Sims responded with a hearty bench slap.But now the opinion gets amended to -- largely -- take out the slams on Judge Saiers, in large part because the Court of Appeal accepts the word of the San Joaquin District Attorney, who writes a pretty persuasive… [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:47 am
So, as applied here, it's a largely academic debate, albeit an important one whose conclusion may substantially affect other cases.Parenthetically, how embarrassed must the trial court -- Judge Peter Deddeh (down here in San Diego) -- be about forgetting the reasonable doubt instruction. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:33 pm
In Startzell v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:59 pm
In People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:50 pm
Including the very first one cited by Justice McAdams: a 1995 student-written comment by a then-USD student, and current California attorney, Lise Forquer (now Lise Jacobson) in the San Diego Law Review.Great job, Lise. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 5:10 am
Margaret McKeown of San Diego. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:47 am
Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:25 am
AS AN ASIDE, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE HIGHEST DAMAGE AWARD CASES IN TRADEMARKS TEND TO BE REVERSE CONFUSION CASES, BUT IN THOSE CASES, IT TENDS TO BE DAVID v GOLIATH. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:23 am
Under United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:22 pm
Still, the opinion in the case of David Phommachanh v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 12:29 pm
We have offices conveniently located in Chicago, New York, San Francisco, Houston, Dallas, Phoenix, New Orleans, and Mexico City. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 2:06 pm
Way back in May, 1994, in San Jose, Mr. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 5:36 pm
Syverson v. [read post]
