Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
The superior court clerk must "promptly mail" to the Court of Appeal notification of the filing of a notice of appeal. . . . [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:20 pm
Bourne Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 6:08 pm
The District Court refused to approve the settlement, noting that under AmChem Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:57 am
We stressed that a district court, 'based on its unique perspective at the scene, is in a far superior position than this Court to appropriately consider allegations of juror misconduct, both during trial and during deliberations.' Id. ... [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:09 pm
Throughout this ruckus, the court's actual opinion was so much constitutional wallpaper.I just finished reading Little Pink House (available from Amazon here), and it is true that it provides only a smattering of detail about the legal issues involved and the decisions by the Connecticut Superior Court, Supreme Court, and the U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:59 am
In its editorial, the Statesman argues that an imminent ruling from the US Supreme Court in the Caperton v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 4:13 am
People cannot comply with laws the existence of which is concealed. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
In January, CalBizLit posted about then scheduled argument in People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:42 pm
Here's a report of a lawsuit filed on March 2 in Superior Court in Oakland, California: Rev. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:28 pm
The recent Supreme Court case of Crawford v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:24 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
" "When people come to get divorced in a typical family court proceeding, obviously when you come with a marriage, a valid marriage, you leave with a divorce. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:48 pm
Few people seem to give a damn about the First Amendment anymore. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:00 am
Georgia Courts continue to recognize this evidentiary burden as seen most recently in Custer v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Employee required to answer employer's work-related inquiriesSpielbauer v County of Santa Clara [Calif.], Supreme Court of California, decided February 9, 2009. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:16 am
In People v Morbillo(2008 NY Slip Op 09102, 56 AD3d 694 [2d Dept 11/18/08]) the Second Department considered the consequence of the failure of a superior court, during the plea proceedings, to advise the defendant that his sentence would run consecutively to the undischarged sentence on his prior conviction. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 8:52 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled that Canadians have no expectation of privacy in their online identity. [read post]
