Search for: "People v. Waits"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 5,499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
And in Dayco (Canada) Limited v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
The takeaway, for me at least, is that we must consider each of these proposed reforms from a rules v. standards perspective. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
While it would be the normal course of action for the Karlsruhe and Mannheim courts to unstay the infringement cases before them, I wouldn't be completely surprised if they decided to wait (at least with their rulings) before the invalidation proceedings have been completed before the BGH. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:10 am
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:20 am
District Court for Central California ordered the parties in Angelotti Chiropractic v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in this Term’s most important case addressing the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
You might have read about him at Simple Justice or Defending People or BoingBoing or Techdirt or Reason any of the other places that reported on the ghastly episode. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:26 pm
So David's got to wait a year-plus to actually get a trial date. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm
A pool of experts waits. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:32 am
I also think about all those people who waited a long time for police assistance at the exact time that Sgt. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:05 pm
No need to wait until you are above 10,000 feet. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:07 pm
The case is Ligon/Floyd v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
And then there is the case of State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
They are waiting for a judgment certifying their class action. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner) Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to discourage… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:31 am
So, I guess you could call it . . . wait for it . . . [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:31 am
So, I guess you could call it . . . wait for it . . . [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 12:19 am
”Don’t worry about it, wait for number three”, and so on. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/l2MXeuR5q1 -> Newbury v Sun Microsystems Ltd – when is a settlement offer binding? [read post]
