Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 55,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2013, 7:26 am
The abstract:In NFIB v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
The first is to hold that the power to search incident to arrest generally includes the power to search cell phones, provided that the search is truly incidental to the arrest: R. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:15 am
Department for Education v Molyneux: [2012] EWCA Civ 193; [2012] WLR (D) 50 “Regulations E33(2A) and E33(3) of the Teachers’ Pensions Regulations 1997, as amended, did not impose an obligation on the Secretary of State, when considering an application by a teacher for an early pension due to ill-health, made pursuant to regulation E4(4), to request further information from the teacher where the submitted medical evidence did not disclose the incapacity… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:05 am
The bottom line in the Health Care Cases (National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:08 pm
Adler) In today’s NYT, Brooklyn Law’s Jason Mazzone explains why Judge Hudson’s analysis in Virginia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:14 am
The case, PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 12:57 pm
David Goldman writes here about Gurfinkel v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:50 am
Last evening, the Georgetown Law Supreme Court Institute and the Center for Constitutional Rights sponsored at panel discussion, The Future of Habeas Corpus and Executive Power, that took an in-depth look at today's arguments before the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
"[J]udicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited" (Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
"[J]udicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited" (Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]). [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 9:59 pm
By Joshua Rich -- In this case, the question ultimately answered by the Federal Circuit was a straightforward question of statutory interpretation: in determining whether a party is time-barred from filing a petition for inter partes review because a privy of that party or the real party in interest was served with a complaint alleging infringement of the challenged patent, at what point in time should privity or party interests be determined? [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:06 am
The case was Trump v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 10:38 am
Merpel says, keep an eye on what the institutional investors are doing: once the pensions funds are bidding, we'll know that IP auctions have come of age.Patent agent Brett Slaney, of Blakes, (formerly Blake, Cassels & Graydon - the name which has all but vanished from the firm's smart new website) has warned the IPKat that, as of yesterday, 2 June 2007, the Canadian Patent Office now requires a declaration as to how the named applicant(s) is/are entitled to apply for and be… [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:09 pm
In Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 8:09 pm
Natelson were he not so central to the efforts of both the BBA Task Force and COSPas well as the enormously powerful ALEC. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 2:52 am
Regina (Webb) v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] WLR (D) 241 “S 116 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 conferred a unique statutory power to sentence a defendant for a new offence committed while on release on licence for an earlier offence. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:53 pm
Kuhn Chevrolet or Herron v. [read post]
