Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS" Results 3241 - 3260 of 5,573
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2020, 5:44 pm by Lyle Roberts
In Norfolk County Retirement Systems v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 11:27 am
Once substantive discovery does commence, I would expect it to proceed much faster than it has, for example, in the USA v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 9:15 pm
A key case here is Tunkl v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 8:37 pm
Gunther's activities also figured in the notable and recently decided case of Gunther v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:00 pm by John Ahlers and Paige Spratt
In the sale of goods contracts, it is common for sellers to limit the remedies available to buyers of goods in the event the goods prove defective (see UCC 2-719)protecting the supplier/seller from liability for consequential damages.In AIA 201 (2007) § 15.1.6, both Owner and Contractor "waive Claims against each other for consequential damages arising out of or relating to" the construction contract. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:21 am by Ansara Law Personal Injury Attorneys
Our Fort Lauderdale personal injury lawyers at The Ansara Law Firm noted as much when the Florida Supreme Court said as much in 2017 when in North Broward Hospital District v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:52 am
A Tennessee case which provides a very useful review of the ground rules governing the use of real estate appraisers in condemnation actions is City of Brentwood v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 1:50 pm by Gene Killian
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently considered the implications of an assignment in Haskell Properties, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 1:34 pm by Philip P. Mann
The other of these cases, Milo & Gabby v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:32 am by Ad Law Defense
The result: coffee sellers in California have no choice but to label their beverages with a Prop 65 warning. [read post]