Search for: "State of Miss. v. United States"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 4,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 5:19 am
Am I missing something here? [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 4:15 am
First Amendment and Confrontation Clause cases always garner a lot of attention, but over the last several years, after 2005’s United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
Moore-Bick LJ said “Finally, it is necessary to mention briefly the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of MGN v The United Kingdom (Application No. 39401/04), in which the court held that the award of costs in favour of Miss Campbell against MGN that included a success fee (upheld in Campbell v MGN (No. 2)) involved an infringement of the defendant’s right to free speech. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
For example, in Hurst v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:05 pm
The majority of the “Rakofksy 74” defendants are scattered across the United States and Canada. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:24 pm
Article 12 also goes to the heart of the RP case, and it would be highly significant if the European Court were to refer to the obligation it places on states to provide ‘support to persons with disabilities in the exercise of their legal capacity’ – as this also seems to be one of the missing pieces in the UK’s case. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 10:04 pm
United States v. 39 Cases, 192 F. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Young v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 11:34 pm
Curiel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Qualcomm faces an increased risk of a San Jose-like experience in San Diego, with the only structural difference that makes the outcome harder to predict being the involvement of a jury, while the FTC trial was a bench trial (before a judge without a jury).At the Thursday hearing, Judge Curiel made an explicit reference to the FTC case, describing Judge Koh's partial summary judgment on… [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
(IP finance) United Kingdom Digital Economy Act emerges from judicial review largely unscathed (IP Osgoode) (Out Law) P2P lawyer fined after £5.99 web host falls to Anonymous attacks (ArsTechnica) Small application, streamlined track: copyright licences hit the fast lane (IPKat) United States US General The PROTECT-IP Act: COICA redux (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Technology Liberation Front) (Copyright… [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Great Migration had produced important swing blocs of black voters in northern and border states who in 1930 shocked the nation with their demand that a nominee to the Supreme Court care about racial justice. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Email us noteworthy articles we may have missed at wakeman.lawfare@gmail.com and singh.lawfare@gmail.com. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 10:35 pm
TSA Passenger Screening: The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in an order that most of the media missed, last week denied a follow up writ of mandamus to compel the rulemaking the court ordered in July 2011 in Electronic Privacy Information Center v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:19 am
LEXIS 11373February 4, 2011, Decided February 4, 2011, Filed And UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 2011 U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:49 pm
Playables (1709 Blog) (IPKat) United States US Patents – Decisions ITC issues final determination finding violation of 19 USC § 1337 and terminates investigation in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) brought by Rambus (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) District Court Delaware: Source code for future products is discoverable: BigBand Networks Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
And, it is sorely missed today. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
The article argues that the Consultation has too much missing for it to be treated as a reliable representation of what is being proposed. [read post]
