Search for: "State v. Agent" Results 3241 - 3260 of 11,876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2009, 12:44 pm
Continuing our coverage of the invitation briefs filed by the United States in the past few weeks, the Solicitor General’s office has filed briefs recommending that certiorari be denied in the following cases: No. 08-448, CNN v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:53 pm
Delossantos, No. 06-4813 "In a prosecution for drug-related offenses, grant of a motion to suppress post-arrest statements and evidence obtained from defendant's apartment and car is reversed where agents had probable cause to arrest defendant based on known or reasonably trustworthy information possessed by agents" CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, SENTENCING US v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:32 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office and their agents, servants, and employees are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Rules” Notes: The court made no attempt to carve-out portions of the rules that may be legal. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:24 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 The Appeal Court failed to draw a distinction between the threat from other prisoners, and the conduct for which the state was responsible, whereas the correct legal test when the threat comes from the acts of third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:14 am by Vikram David Amar
SAPA also imposes liability on any “political subdivision or law enforcement agency that knowingly employs an individual [who is] acting or who previously acted as an official, agent, employee or deputy of the government of the United States . . . [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:01 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
And not only that, but there is a 1988 federal United States Supreme Court case, Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 6:33 am
State, 336 Ga.App. 428, 429, 785 S.E.2d 84 (Georgia Court of Appeals 2016).DeGeorgis v. [read post]