Search for: "State v. Back"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 42,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 12:36 am
R (Peat and others) v Hyndburn DC [2011] EWHC 1739 (Admin) is the first successful challenge to a selective licensing scheme. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 9:17 am
Case citation: Cohoon v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:41 am
See Heisner v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:05 pm
Circuit, see, e.g., Michigan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 9:23 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
For patent litigators, we (and our experts) step back in time to the priority date - often the filing date of the application - to assess validity. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:28 am
In the five page opinion, the court says little more than strict interpretation of the MSP gives Medicare a fairly opened ended, unquestioned right to recovery without the burden of equity considerations, that this is the way that it has always been dating back to Zinman v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
In his view, Bivens’s central holding—“that the Constitution provides federal courts with considerable legal authority to use traditional remedies to right constitutional wrongs” (p. 5)— goes back to Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
In his view, Bivens’s central holding—“that the Constitution provides federal courts with considerable legal authority to use traditional remedies to right constitutional wrongs” (p. 5)— goes back to Marbury v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 2:27 pm
United States on Monday. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
At which point they violate his parole and put him back in prison.What a world. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am
Dating to 1976’s Buckley v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Holmes, III, of the Western District of Arkansas accepted the stipulation and remanded the case back to state court. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:27 am
A recent Court of Appeal case brought back into the limelight the issue of tenancy deposit schemes. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 11:58 am
Walnut Place LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm
In the case of Haldimann and Others v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
In 1985, the Supreme Court decided that a police officer's use of a level of force that the Court deemed excessive--despite being authorized by state law and consistent with a rule going back to the common law and widely adopted by the states--was an "unreasonable seizure" in violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 4:34 pm
District Court in National Women’s Law Center v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
In order to conduct such transactions, among other things, the managing institution likely has to be licensed in some fashion under state law, the customer’s identity must be known, and the institution has to report the transaction. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
