Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 3241 - 3260 of 4,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/828687.no1.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals: State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
I would predict that until there is a clearer picture as to what on earth is going in the Queen’s Bench Division, it is not just defendants who are forced to be brave, but claimants too. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
The rights and the duties of the Standing Committee, except as provided in the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention, may be prescribed by the Canons of the respective Dioceses.ARTICLE V. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:17 pm by The Legal Blog
The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court has held that a descriptive word cannot be registered as a trademark. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
The points to consider were stated to be:“(i) the financial position of the parties (s289(2) 1988 Act). [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
I shall not consider here the amendments proposed to the canons. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) C, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2578 (04 November 2010) Qazi & Anor, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2579 (04 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) HHY Luxembourg Sarl & Anr v Barclays Bank Plc & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1248 (22 October 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Eurocall Ltd v Energis Communications Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 2790… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
   The court's decision, by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Ira B. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
”In view of this, the court ruled, “there is no ground to conclude that [the Authority] violated the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law Section 296), prohibiting disability-based discrimination” and dismissed Fallon’s appeal.* Section 71 provides for leave in connection with a work-connected injury or disease. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:16 am
Free speechCouncil 82 [ex rel Kuhnel], v State of New York, App. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Justice Fisher draws a sharp distinction between rulings by New York's highest court in Sterling Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 11:46 pm by Matthew Hill
R v M(L) and others [2010] EWCA Crim 2327; [2010] WLR(D) 266 – Read judgment The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) has provided further guidance to prosecutors on whether or not they should bring charges against victims of human trafficking who go on to commit crimes. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:22 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Earlier today I posted ablog entry on the unreported Appellate Division decision in Holden v, Holden decided on October 28, 2010. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:29 am by gmlevine
The term derives from US trademark case law, although as noted in a recent decision in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division (citing cases from most of the Circuit Courts of Appeal) , OCH-Ziff Management Europe Limited v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court observed that because "plaintiff's contention that the action was stayed pursuant to CPLR 321 (c) [was] raised for the first time on appeal," it "[was] not properly before [the Appellate Division]. [read post]