Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 11:44 am
Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am
Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:28 pm
Unfortunately, it appears that Carefusion has not recently reviewed the Anti-Dilution Act set forth in 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), which states that a “famous” mark is one that is “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 11:10 am
Their ruling could have ripple effects well beyond California: As Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern have observed at Slate, over a dozen states have laws that are intended to discourage women from having abortions by requiring abortion providers to tell their patients, for example, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer or that abortion increases the risk of suicide. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:07 pm
In an infamous case, People -v- Brandon, Judge Somers ruled that, "the MMA is rendered unconstitutional in its entirety by operation of the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution." [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:54 am
In an infamous case, People -v- Brandon, Judge Somers ruled that, "the MMA is rendered unconstitutional in its entirety by operation of the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution." [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In a 51-page ruling in Biro v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
, (49(1) Monash University Law Review (2023)).Dov Fox & Jill Wieber Lens, Texas Says a Fetus Is a Child, Except When a Parent Sues a Negligent Doctor or State Official, (Slate (online), August 23, 2023).Zainuddin Zainuddin, Salle Salle & Andi Risma, Balanced Justice in Islamic Inheritance to Realize Unity and Sustainability of Collective Life, (August 13, 2023).From SmartCILP:Wilson Huhn, Analysis of Carson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:41 am
Agency of Natural Res. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 5:30 am
In so holding, the appellate court held that the district court did not err in its conclusion that the eight “digits of confusion” did not support a finding that there existed a substantial likelihood of confusion between the senior trademark of Rampart Resources and the mark of Rampart/Wurth (Rampart Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
The case is Lopez v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:25 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 1:10 pm
In Champion v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Auth., 118 AD3d 550, 551 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Sue/Perior Concrete & Paving, Inc. v Seneca Gaming Corp., 99 AD3d 1203, 1204).Because of the retained sovereignty of Indian Nations, the subject matter jurisdiction of state courts “must be predicated on explicit authorization from Congress to address matters of tribal self-government” (Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d at 292). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:29 pm
In the appropriately named Liberty v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
