Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 11,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
The Court stated that saving costs is a legitimate objective of public policy but, if a benefit is to be limited to save costs, it must be limited in a non-discriminatory way, citing paragraph 66 of O’Brien v Ministry of Justice [2012] ICR 955 ‘budgetary considerations cannot justify discrimination’. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:13 am
District Court Judge Linda V. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 3:03 am
“State-run retirement plans are the wrong way to protect the poor” [Andrew G. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:17 pm
In 2007, the Supreme Court dramatically changed the landscape when it decided Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:58 am
The issue of student loans was one of the issues addressed in the unreported (non-precedential) Appellate Division opinion in the case of M.F.W. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
LandWatch San Luis Obispo County v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:10 pm
In Agredano v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am
If no distinctiveness exists in relation to the mark from the very beginning, acquired distinctiveness would have to be shown in the EU.No amount of cute advertising could save the KitKat shapeWhen it comes to acquired distinctiveness, the Court emphasised that, for any mark devoid of inherent distinctiveness, "…evidence be submitted, in respect of each individual Member State, of the acquisition by that mark of distinctive character through use, the evidence submitted… [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am
If no distinctiveness exists in relation to the mark from the very beginning, acquired distinctiveness would have to be shown in the EU.No amount of cute advertising could save the KitKat shapeWhen it comes to acquired distinctiveness, the Court emphasised that, for any mark devoid of inherent distinctiveness, "…evidence be submitted, in respect of each individual Member State, of the acquisition by that mark of distinctive character through use, the evidence submitted… [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:55 am
Pealer v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:25 am
His vote and his opinions created a revolution for gay rights, helped save Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 6:28 pm
The Court in Nanaimo (City) v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The new decision in United States v. [read post]
