Search for: "State v. South"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 10,933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2010, 8:51 am
State, Dep’t of Envtl. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:59 am
V. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 7:32 pm
Before Roe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
State Board of Higher Education v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
State Board of Higher Education v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
IEEC submitted applications to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) for a permit to construct the project and for a Title V permit under the CAA. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm
Prior to H.B. 232, Kentucky was one of only four states—including Alabama, New Mexico, and South Dakota—that had not adopted data breach notification legislation. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 7:26 am
In Teva Pharmaceutical Industries v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 1:55 pm
South Carolina In Andino v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
§ 2244(d)(1), while a Nevada state prisoner loses under equitable tolling.McMonagle v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:18 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
Justice Sotomayor points out that if Baby Girl’s grandparents want to adopt her, under this decision the South Carolina court must consider them under the placement preferences. *25 (Sotomayor J. dissenting). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:59 pm
To state the obvious, such legislation would be contrary not only to Roe v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 7:37 am
., LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:59 am
Zinke/Brackeen v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:59 am
Zinke/Brackeen v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:56 pm
” State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:48 am
South Dakota is one of thirteen U.S. states that make it easier for food producers to sue on libel or defamation grounds. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
