Search for: "Supreme Court of Florida"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 18,476
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
De facto secondary meaning is a doctrine with a purpose that should still guide us: The Supreme Court recognized that people correctly understood that for a long time all shredded wheat came from Nabisco. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:54 am
The Florida Supreme Court recently addressed the state’s statutory damages cap in cases against a governmental entity or actor. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Supreme Court Halts Census in Latest Twist of 2020 Count Associated Press News – Mike Schneider | Published: 10/14/2020 The U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:11 am
Supreme Court to stay the holding. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
And of course there would remain the question of whether the Supreme Court would approve the compact’s constitutionality. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 6:23 am
Meanwhile in Florida, we plan to stream people into our courts for trials, and then send them out for lunch and dinner at open bars and restaurants. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Finance Washington: “Port of Tacoma, Others Agree to Fine in Save Tacoma Water Campaign Finance Case” by Alexid Krell (Tacoma News-Tribune) for MSN Elections National: “Fake Twitter Accounts Posing as Black Trump Supporters Appear, Reach Thousands, Then Vanish” by Craig Timberg and Isaac Stanley-Becker for Washington Post Ethics National: “Supreme Court Won’t Revive Congressional Emoluments Case Against Trump” by Robert Barnes… [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Gundy v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
And of course, the emailer focused on justifying the Supreme Court nomination, which was not the focus of my column.But setting those meta-issues aside, note that the emailer was eager to tell me that I was wrong to say that Trump’s support is largely based on bigotry. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm
Florida, 19-7309Issue: Whether the Florida Supreme Court’s analysis of Chambers v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
It would violate the “anti-commandeering” principle of the Tenth Amendment, as understood by the Supreme Court, to force a state government to use rank-choice ballots if the state government did not want to. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm
Nevertheless, given the Supreme Court’s determination in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court’s July decision presumably removes any doubt about the constitutionality of such “instructed” electors. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:10 am
Supreme Court, the 13 U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:06 am
But competing election certificates came in from different state authorities, prompting the federal government to create an electoral commission of five representatives, five senators and five Supreme Court justices to decide what to do about the disputed returns. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Supreme Court, is “Delaware’s courts are widely regarded as the least partisan and most professional in the nation. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of a lower court ruling that upheld a U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
What people like me can do, however, is at the very least make it clear just how brazen the Supreme Court would have to be to allow Trump to steal the election. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
Doe, 19-1108Issue: Whether the First Amendment and the Supreme Court’s decision in NAACP v. [read post]
