Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 2:03 am
* F&C, having proved its case, was entitled to injunctive relief, money, delivery up of infringing material and presumably anything else it fancied. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:01 am
* F&C, having proved its case, was entitled to injunctive relief, money, delivery up of infringing material and presumably anything else it fancied. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:51 am
One reader wrote, "How can a guy in a non-motorized plastic blow up boat do any harm to anyone but himself? [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:32 pm
Richard v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
The resolve of the trial bar in protecting the law of torts was inadequate or inept. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:30 am
http://t.co/0vWF04PP # Dropbox Reports User Accounts Were Hijacked, Adds New Security Features http://t.co/wQetUfUW # Prison workers settle lawsuit http://t.co/x5ozIgKO # Data breaches up 19 percent, GAO reports http://t.co/8EHEgUQM # Privacy commissioner ‘deeply disturbed’ by Election Ontario’s handling of voter data http://t.co/F0q5SIer # CSO Magazine Publishes Hogan Lovells Article "Dangerous Assumptions About Clouds" http://t.co/LGWFimug # NBC Is The… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748 (1976), is listed as a “fraud” case. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
Many of those relieved at the outcome of the litigation about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) think the Chief Justice called a ball a strike, a strike a ball, but at the end of the day at least the batter was safe on base. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:52 am
, Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:15 am
Hey friendly reader, before you keep reading you might want to check out this follow-up post that I did by clicking on this link. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
Reliance upon cooking by the consumer does not seem like a good idea. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm
” (Interestingly, it would be relatively easy to secure copyright for jokes, but comedians just don’t use the copyright system to protect against copying, almost without exception.) [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
This is because off-label promotion is not inherently fraudulent; truthful off-label promotion of drugs does not violate RICO or state consumer protection laws.In re Epogen & Aranesp Off-Label Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation, 2009 WL 1703285, at *7 (C.D. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
Ritani, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
The Administration, which didn't want to be perceived as raising taxes justified the individual mandate as an exercise of the Commerce Clause, a la the famous New Deal case of Wickerd v Filburn. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:15 am
See post on Kee v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm
Concerned about how the mandates and costs of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act will impact your corporate and family finances following the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:06 pm
Yes, anonymous speech is protected. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:06 pm
Yes, anonymous speech is protected. [read post]
