Search for: "U. S. v. Grant" Results 3241 - 3260 of 3,556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Perry (1959) — before SCOTUS went N-U-T-S in the 1960s. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am by Peter Mahler
The first is CTNY Investors 3, LLC v DME CRE Opportunity Fund I LP, 2014 NY Slip Op 30268(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 29, 2014], decided last month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 8:16 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Wisdom Import Sales Co., L.L.C. v Labatt Brewing Co., Ltd., 339 F3d 101 [2d Cir 2003] [“bargained-for minority right to participate in corporate management has value in and of itself and a denial of that right, without more, can give rise to irreparable harm”]; Louis Foodservice Corp. v Vouyiouklis, 2002 NY Slip Op 50448 [U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2002] [“It is well-settled that plaintiffs’ alleged harm, an opportunity for defendants to shift the… [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Post-Petition Oppressive Conduct Warrants Order of Dissolution Absent Buy-Out Kassab v Kasab, 56 Misc 3d 1213(A), 2017 NY Slip Op 50986(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Aug. 3, 2017]. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Post-Petition Oppressive Conduct Warrants Order of Dissolution Absent Buy-Out Kassab v Kasab, 56 Misc 3d 1213(A), 2017 NY Slip Op 50986(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Aug. 3, 2017]. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:33 am by Christopher Tyner
After the trial court granted the motion to withdraw and announced new appointed counsel, the ADA told the trial court that the trial would need to be pushed back from the calendared date of December 16, 2019, to February 24, 2020, so that the new appointed counsel had time to become familiar with the case. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 3:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Harris v Harris, 2020 NY Slip Op 31570(U) [Supreme Court, New York County Apr. 23, 2020], Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Nanny M. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
However, recognizing that the proposed Amendment remedies are merely a short-term solution, Part V, also reprinted below, questions the compatibility of speculative invoicing with copyright law’s underlying goals and purposes, and makes some arguments in favor of systemic reform of copyright law more generally, an issue with which Questioncopyright.org is intimately familiar. ... [read post]