Search for: "U.S. Judiciary"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 11,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 2:37 pm
Update: we confirmed with the Clerk that the arguments are on Tuesday, October 13, 2009, and not on "Thursday" October 13 as noted on the Judiciary web site. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 1:45 pm
Press release: Firm Will Highlight How U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
Matthew Kahn posted FBI director nominee Christopher Wray’s written responses to the Senate Judiciary Committee’s questions for the record. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Taylor also summarized U.S. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
Taylor also summarized U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:41 am
” Last week, Senators Lindsay Graham, also on the Judiciary Committee, and Cory Booker said they were drafting a similar bill. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:00 pm
The bill is currently before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:14 pm
The dissent says that this is both a misreading of the statute as well as very dangerous, since it effectively makes the U.S. its own judge of the merits, without oversight by a neutral judiciary. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:23 am
On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 4:23 pm
But a pending appeal before the en banc U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:06 am
Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:08 pm
., lmelton@dhayeslaw.com THE HAYES LAW FIRM, www.dhayeslaw.com Earlier this month the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 1:50 pm
At a San Francisco hearing in EFF's case last month, U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:43 pm
Judge David Tatel and lawyers from the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:38 am
’” The U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:02 am
Repealing the measure would return the state to a standard set by a 1987 U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:02 am
Repealing the measure would return the state to a standard set by a 1987 U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:06 am
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) apply on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]
