Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. "
Results 3241 - 3260
of 8,925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2017, 11:03 am
Second, while Wikimedia, and before that EFF’s clients in Jewel v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
With the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:15 pm
Gomez is vice president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, which has taken positions on Supreme Court cases pertaining to both issues Gomez addressed. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:41 am
In its decision in March 1925 in Carroll v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm
It resulted in a 2008 Supreme Court decision—Munaf v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 8:35 am
Here are the briefs(PDF) in the matter of Standing Rock Sioux Tribe et al v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am
(later joined by SolarWorld Americas, Inc.) pursuant to Sections 201-202 of the Trade Act of 1974. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:26 am
(later joined by SolarWorld Americas, Inc.) pursuant to Sections 201-202 of the Trade Act of 1974. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:20 am
That California judge, featured in Time Magazine,[v] is William W. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:08 am
Another interesting question might be whether any of these obviously offensive applications will satisfy the essential predicates to registration, and actually adorn the Principal Register, with official Certificates of Registration issued in the name of the United States of America? [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
They lost in the Supreme Court in a 5-to-4 decision in 1973 (Gilligan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
After the Supreme Court’s 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm
And the rationale for selecting these countries was based on objective criteria regarding how each nation shares information with the United States—precisely the grounds stated in the March executive order. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
TRUMP, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in this proclamation, the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 2 of this… [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:44 am
In fact, only a judgment given by a court of a Contracting State designated in an exclusive choice of court agreement shall be recognised and enforced in other Contracting States. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:01 am
See United Steel Workers of America v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:01 am
See United Steel Workers of America v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 5:10 am
This got me thinking of Alexis de Tocqueville, who famously said that “[s]carcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm
Under the Rule, entrepreneurs would be required to demonstrate that their entry to the United States would create a ‘significant public benefit’ to the United States, and that their proposed businesses would provide a ‘substantial’ and ‘demonstrated potential’ to create more jobs and business growth in the United States, and not merely to provide income to the entrepreneur and his or her family members. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am
A 2013 Senate investigation found that Apple has structured two Irish subsidiaries to be tax residents of neither the United States, where they are managed and controlled, nor Ireland, where they are incorporated. [read post]
