Search for: "US v. Banks"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 14,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2017, 6:59 am
The plaintiffs, a financial services firm and two proprietary trading firms, contend that the banks abused their position as primary dealers to manipulate an important benchmark in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act, the Sherman Act, and common law (Breakwater Trading LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Bank Failure Resource Kit assembles Practical Guidance resources covering topics related to the recent bank failures. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:41 pm
Services, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:34 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
* AG Cruz Villalon says that (absolute) banking secrecy prevents effective enforcement of IP rightsEleonora reports on AG's Villalon's Opinion in Coty Germany, C-580/13, a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) addressing the balance between banking secrecy and IP enforcement. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:09 am
Smallwood v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
The Eagle v Morgan et al decision came out in March, and is one of the few cases to date that provides some insight as to where the courts may go on social media content. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:05 am
Troice and Proskauer Rose LLP v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:22 am
Smith v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
The foundational case is Lyus v Prowsa Developments [1982] 1 WLR 1044, but, as Lloyd LJ noted, there were three key points about that case: (a) Ms Lyus’ right didn’t bind the bank, which sold the property; (b) Ms Lyus’ right was specifically identified in the bank’s contract of sale; and (c) Ms Lyus could not have done any more to protect her right. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
The foundational case is Lyus v Prowsa Developments [1982] 1 WLR 1044, but, as Lloyd LJ noted, there were three key points about that case: (a) Ms Lyus’ right didn’t bind the bank, which sold the property; (b) Ms Lyus’ right was specifically identified in the bank’s contract of sale; and (c) Ms Lyus could not have done any more to protect her right. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Trump v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:00 am
The post <em>Wilson et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:50 am
If you think you have been treated unfairly by your bank when disputing unauthorized bank charges (including charges on pre-paid benefits cards), please contact us. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
" CPLR 327 requires that "balancing of many factors," and the decision to retain jurisdiction over a dispute is within the motion court's discretion (Al Rushaid v Pictet & Cie, 28 NY3d 316, 332 [2016]; see Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474, 479 [1984], cert denied 469 US 1108 [1985]). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
" CPLR 327 requires that "balancing of many factors," and the decision to retain jurisdiction over a dispute is within the motion court's discretion (Al Rushaid v Pictet & Cie, 28 NY3d 316, 332 [2016]; see Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474, 479 [1984], cert denied 469 US 1108 [1985]). [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:46 am
Wells Fargo Bank, (Contra Costa County Superior Court, California), • Gil v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:08 am
In its 2012 decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:51 am
(quoting Ahmed v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:24 pm
Whether or not Congress intended such a meaning, this Court must give effect to the plain language Congress used. [read post]
