Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 51,291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm
(The internal quotes go to Gregory v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
"The case reference is HTC Corp. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 12:56 am
The Australian court decision adds novelty to the equation.The case in Mylan v Sun related to Australian patents (AU2006313711, AU2003301807, AU731964) for fenofibrate and its second medical use to treat diabetic retinopathy. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court recently granted review in Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am
Furthermore, the Court decided that it was sufficiently clear whether a given individual was a member of the class or not. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:20 am
Do not, that is, unless the given name is the functional equivalent of a generic affix to a trademarked family name. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:03 pm
In contrast, the Board referred to Atari Games Corp. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:13 am
Measures targeting the Belarusian financial sector have also been implemented given the country’s support of and involvement in the Russian invasion. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:07 am
HipSaver, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 4:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:28 pm
The Eighth Circuit today in US v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 9:37 am
(Given the split results, it wouldn’t surprise me if both sides ask for en banc review). [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm
Given that Google will almost certainly request a rehearing (and potentially ask the Supreme Court to hear this case), a retrial is unlikely to happen this year, but the most likely year for this is 2015. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:15 pm
Practice Tip: This ruling in Helsinn v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:16 pm
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 2:09 pm
Lavender v Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Bolton, 2016 WL 3919056 (NYAD 3 Dept 7/21/016)Filed under: Accessory Uses, Current Caselaw - New York, Uncategorized [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:35 pm
Simpson, 2008 SCC 40, and Grant v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
And if it's not okay, why is rounding okay.Anyhow, in AHMC Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 10:14 am
PMSI 9th Cir: Access of Computer in Violation of Employer's Use Policy Violates Computer Fraud and Abuse Act -- US v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 5:44 am
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Door-to-door evangelism and data protection: Jehovah’s Witnesses v Finland" in Law & Religion UK, 9 May 2023, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2023/05/09/door-to-door-evangelism-and-data-protection-jehovahs-witnesses-v-finland/ [read post]
