Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit" Results 3241 - 3260 of 7,493
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2016, 2:42 pm by Jon
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
”  Separately, the brief argues that the Federal Circuit was correct in its holding that a party can actively induce itself – thus 271(f)(1) inducement does not require a third party to be induced. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:45 am by Kevin LaCroix
On interlocutory appeal, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the district court’s decision. 772 F.3d 158 (3d Cir. 2014). [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit—had permitted Robins to proceed with his lawsuit charging that the people-search company Spokeo had provided users with inaccurate information about him in violation of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), because the data related to Robins. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm by Rick Garnett
With respect to the decision itself, a few things are clear: First, the rulings against the religious-freedom claimants by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third, Fifth, Tenth, and D.C. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:35 am by Wally Zimolong
Today, in a precedential opinion, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of a complaint against my client that alleged that a multi-family building was constructed in violation of the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) design and accessibility requirements for disabled persons. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:18 pm by David Garcia and Helen C. Eckert
  The FTC immediately appealed the district court’s decision to the Third Circuit, also filing an emergency motion to grant an injunction pending appeal and to expedite the appeal. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:35 am by Mark Walsh
“In light of the positions asserted by the parties in their supplemental briefs, the Court vacates the judgments below and remands to the respective United States Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fifth, Tenth, and D. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:35 am by Howard Friedman
Ct., May 16, 2016), the Court said in part:In light of the positions asserted by the parties in their supplemental briefs, the Court vacates the judgments below and remands to the respective United States Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fifth, Tenth, and D. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Handfield, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 14-55797, https://t.co/PZbn3pHibp -> Facebook Gets Bad Ruling In Face-Scanning Privacy Case–In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation https://t.co/3wGH2P3HlE -> In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation – Compare to Facebook v Douez case on way to Supreme Court https://t.co/ws9LAyIoK3 -> Tech Giants Pen Open Letter to Presidential… [read post]
9 May 2016, 1:03 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus and Emma Lewis
The FTC appealed the compensatory sanctions portion of that order, and in August 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the damages portion of the order and remanded the case for a reconsideration of damages. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:14 pm by John Stigi
Apr. 12, 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held, in a Rule 10b-5 securities fraud action, that the district court incorrectly analyzed the price-impact evidence submitted by defendants to rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance that plaintiffs had invoked to satisfy Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance requirement. [read post]
5 May 2016, 11:59 am by Benjamin Wittes
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently affirmed the dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of a complaint brought against Facebook based on allegations strikingly similar to those alleged here. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:37 am by Joy Waltemath
Since the laws were amended, Arizona has aggressively pursued enforcement actions, most of which have been against “unauthorized aliens” (which the appeals court noted refers to those who “entered or are present in the United States in violation of federal immigration law”), though some U.S. citizens and authorized aliens were also prosecuted. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be…subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial ass [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:28 am by SHG
Wally, ever the optimist, hopes that circuit court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]