Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 3241 - 3260
of 4,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:18 am
However, it is worth considering the core parts of these rulings a little more carefully. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:11 am
Recently, the United States Supreme Court affirmed a 2010 ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and held that a bankruptcy court, as a non-Article III court, did not have the constitutional authority to decide a state law claim brought by a debtor against a creditor, even though the matter was part of the “core” statutory jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
In 1997, Strasbourg court was critical of UK interception law in the case of Halford v The United Kingdom (20605/92) [1997] ECHR 32. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am
In 1997, Strasbourg court was critical of UK interception law in the case of Halford v The United Kingdom (20605/92) [1997] ECHR 32. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:56 am
Supreme Court decisions—Washington v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:35 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am
Here is Angelo’s guest post:: On June 10, 2011, Judge Barbara Jones of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision in a case entitled SEC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am
Here is Angelo’s guest post:: On June 10, 2011, Judge Barbara Jones of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision in a case entitled SEC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Constitutional meaning is hotly contested in the United States today. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:11 pm
McAuliffe and his Sexual Predator Unit, which strengthens the State's ability to prosecute child pornography in the future. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:47 pm
But in an homage to the United State Supreme Court, the Court was divided 3-3-1, and so even after reading all the opinions in the case it is not clear what it means for the future.The primary opinion, issue by Chief Judge Lippman, states, "The threshold, and we believe dispositive, issue on these appeals is whether a resentencing sought by a defendant to correct an illegally lenient sentence is effective" to move the date of that prior conviction. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 1:49 pm
The Seventh Circuit’s opinion last week in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
Of particular relevance was the ECtHR decision in A v United Kingdom (2009) 49 EHRR 29. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
This question is at the core of the case of Sufi and Elmi v United Kingdom, in which the Strasbourg Court has ruled that the state of chaos prevailing in Somalia is so dire that repatriation there would amount to a breach of the prohibition on torture and inhuman treatment under Article 3. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
United States District Courts are Article III courts. [read post]
