Search for: "Victory v. State" Results 3241 - 3260 of 6,924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2017, 11:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Tomorrow the Supreme Court wil formally issue its mandate to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit based on last month's landmark decision in Apple v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 5:21 am by James Romoser
National Association of African American-Owned Media and Babb v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 3:48 pm
Hardly the ‘major victory’ the Washington Legal Foundation, one of the friends of the court in this case (case detail), has called the outcome. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:17 am
On appeal this time around, the district court had modified the injunction to impose no further requirements on the defendant, had declined to increase the amount of the bond, and had denied Plaintiff's motion for response costs (in short the district court had finally delivered a full "victory" for the defendant). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:11 am by Susan C. Salmon
  A Washington Court of Appeals ruled last summer in O’Neill v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Supreme Court disagreed, concluding that Wyner was not a prevailing party because her initial victory was “ephemeral" and the final decision on the merits ultimately went against her.In other words, her claim to fees was totally denuded.For a copy of the United States Supreme Court's decision in this case, please use this link: Sole v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:52 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Sotheby's and Decia Ruspoli di Poggio Suas, meanwhile, will end the protracted litigation and receive legal guarantees.The agreement gives federal prosecutors their victory by declaring “that the Statue is forfeitable to the United States as … property brought into the United States contrary to law. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm by Larry
This is the rule of exhaustion.In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:54 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
The ACLU represented the Alabama State NAACP and impacted voters in Shelby County v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:51 pm
Bolsonaro's victory something darker and more ominous that the victory of a person whose political agenda differe [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:36 am by John M. O'Connor
Since the early 1980s, the NLRB has vacillated back and forth on whether non-union employees are entitled to have a co-worker present during an investigatory interview that could result in discipline — a right that has long been afforded union employees pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s holding in NLRB v. [read post]