Search for: "50 Doe Defendants" Results 3261 - 3280 of 7,348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The appellate court held that the dissolution of an LLC does not bar an award of attorney fees because the LLC continues to exist while winding up its affairs. [read post]
The appellate court held that the dissolution of an LLC does not bar an award of attorney fees because the LLC continues to exist while winding up its affairs. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Griffith, No. 07-50531 Defendants' sentences imposed on remand for their participation in a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine are affirmed where: 1) under the mandate rule, defendants waived various objections regarding certain defendants' requests for a decrease for minimal or minor participant; 2) the district court erroneously concluded that the mandate rule precluded other defendants from raising objections to their conspiracy sentences for… [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
  In particular, how does whether the claimant having greater or fewer resources than the defendant affect their intention or whether the behaviour is in any way out of the ordinary? [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:02 am
As a resource for class action defense attorneys who defend against RESPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) class actions, we provide the text of Regulation X.Congress gave authority to the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to promulgate regulations for RESPA, and the regulations are set forth in 24 CFR § 3500.1 et seq.The regulations concerning escrow accounts are set forth in § 3500.17, which provides: … [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:58 am by Peter Mahler
Except in cases of deadlock between two 50/50 shareholders, Delaware does not have a statute authorizing judicial dissolution of a closely-held corporation at the behest of a shareholder. [read post]
That does not resolve the question, however, because it is not clear what effect the Deepwater Horizon court gave to the “Insured Contract” provision alone. [read post]
That does not resolve the question, however, because it is not clear what effect the Deepwater Horizon court gave to the “Insured Contract” provision alone. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:00 am by Victor Rivera Jr.
The case now returns to the lower court for further proceedings, including discovery as to whether the Board’s prior statements unequivocally show that it does not intend to go forward to try and reclaim the exclusive rights. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 12:30 pm by Stephen M. Ozcomert
” For example, under the provision a plaintiff would not be entitled to receive damages if he or she is 50 percent or more responsible for the injury or damages claimed. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:35 pm by Zachary Spilman
However, the brief is remarkable for a number of reasons (that begin with the impressive list of defendants;  any group that includes Donald Rumsfeld, Peter Pace, and “John Does 1-100? [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:47 am by emagraken
 The trial judge found that the Defendants had been largely successful and ordered that the Plaintiff pay the Defendants costs. [read post]