Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 3261 - 3280 of 11,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am by SHG
United States, 136 S.Ct. 2272 (2016) • M. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (American Indian Agricultural Resources Management Act - Leases)Allergan INC. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:17 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (American Indian Agricultural Resources Management Act - Leases)Allergan INC. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
The panel members were Mattias Zigann, the presiding judge of the Munich Regional Court, Philip Kerr of Allens Linklaters and Larry Welch, the Senior Director, and Assistant General Patent Counsel at Eli Lilly and Company.Mr Ludwig explained that the question of what relief was appropriate had been highlighted by the very recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in AMGEN INC & ors v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:15 am by Richard S. Zackin
Caterpillar, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld a forum selection clause requiring a participant in a benefits plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) to bring suit in the Central District of Illinois. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
Applicant maintained that the dominant portion of his design is the map of Africa, while in the cited mark the map of the United States is dominant, that the cited design suggests that Africa dominates the United States, and that the alteration of his design to fit the United States outline within the map of Africa profoundly changes the commercial impression of his mark as compared to the cited mark. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:28 pm by Larry
I will have a lot of time in airplanes this week, so I’ll try and knock out some updates.Kent International, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
For example, a case with a caption like United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant before acquiring cell-site-location information from wireless carriers, that “question the factual and legal assumptions of the pro-Carpenter briefs. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am by Barry Sookman
Unquestionably, the First Amendment protects Google’s display of search results within the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Among the three cases on the Court’s docket is Leidos, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
In Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
United States Three Russians named in the Trump dossier are suing the private investigation firm Fusion GPS for libel over the handling of the dossier. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]