Search for: "AT&T Operations Inc" Results 3261 - 3280 of 10,920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2018, 11:19 am by Aaron Lancaster
Opponents of the measure allege that it would apply different standards for companies in California, and have argued that “[i]t is unworkable, requiring the internet and businesses in California to operate differently than the rest of the world – limiting our choices, hurting our businesses, and cutting our connection to the global economy. [read post]
13 May 2018, 9:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court distinguished Motherless from the site in Fung, where the site marketed itself as a pirate site, the site’s operators solicited copyrighted material, and it assisted users in viewing such material. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:22 am by admin
But if red flags arise or even if you just sense something may be amiss and you don’t know why, don’t ignore your intuition. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm by MOTP
Travis testified that the arrangement ultimately “didn’t work out” and ended approximately nine months later.1 Hammond, however, disputed Travis’s characterization of their arrangement. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Polsinelli represents other similarly situated ICOs and has advised those clients that they operate outside of SEC jurisdiction). [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:30 am by Corbin Bridge
Throughout the 1970s and 1980s Waste Management, Inc. became a major player in the US waste disposal business by acquiring nearly 133 small operators. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:30 am by Corbin Bridge
Throughout the 1970s and 1980s Waste Management, Inc. became a major player in the US waste disposal business by acquiring nearly 133 small operators. [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:41 am by Jeffrey D. Polsky
Employers are still reeling from last week’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:02 pm by Gordon Firemark
On April 30, 2018, California Supreme Court rendered its decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Failing to prove any one of these criteria is enough to establish that the worker is an employee, and not an excluded independent contractor, for purposes of the wage order (Dynamex Operations West, Inc., April 30, 2018, Cantil-Sakauye, T.). [read post]