Search for: "Beach v. State" Results 3261 - 3280 of 3,884
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lisa McElroy
  Environmentalists and property rights activists are holding their breath waiting for Stop the Beach Renourishment, a case from December about whether state restoration of beaches constitutes a taking under the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:56 pm by Erin Miller
United States, and McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
DECEMBER SITTING: Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 3:50 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Today, by a 3-2 vote, the Hawaii Supreme Court declined to review the decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals in Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 8:24 pm by Mike
 Thus, a criminal case reads: People of the State of California v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:37 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Pileggi of Fox Rothschild in his Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog Krupski v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:20 pm by Big Tent Democrat
As the Palm Beach Post Ed Board explained: Florida is one of 25 states that, along with the District of Columbia, make public financing available for abortion only in cases of life endangerment, rape or incest. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:53 am
Home prices in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties increased 0.9 percent from April to May. [read post]
Supreme Court issued its decision today on an important issue of chapter 13 bankruptcy law in the case of Hamilton, Chapter 13 Trustee v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by WIMS
But officials warn tar balls could start hitting area beaches by tomorrow. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Mandelman
 If I wanted to use the corporation, I suppose I would simply contact the state and pay the current fees and bring it back to life. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]