Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 14,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
Scalia preferred to apply the right to bear arms against the states through substantive due process-- the same doctrine that he bitterly complains about in gay rights and abortion cases. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
” Gorman v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
In that regard, the mere fact that the commercial seller of reproduction equipment, devices and media is established in a Member State other than that in which the purchasers reside has no bearing on that obligation to achieve a certain result. [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:59 pm
W.O. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Thousands of grocery stores carry Kraft cheeses bearing that label. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
See Armstrong v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:30 pm
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Finally ending its Second Amendment silence, the Supreme Court in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:11 pm
Supreme Court has issued a decision in the Cyan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 8:24 am
It is far from obvious, then, that the First Amendment principles articulated in Claiborne Hardware would have any bearing here (and we do not ordinarily grant en banc rehearing to resolve questions of state law). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Debate on last week’s oral arguments in McCutcheon v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 5:11 am
Monster Energy Company v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:04 am
Assocs. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:35 pm
“[W]here the Federal Government directs the States to regulate, it may be state officials who will bear the brunt of public disapproval, while the federal officials who devised the regulatory program may remain insulated from the electoral ramifications of their decision. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:56 pm
Nothing in Article V grants Congress that power, and it is difficult to see Congress doing so when roughly forty states would have less influence under such a system than under one-state-one vote. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 7:30 pm
And, if the Brecht standard applies, does the petitioner or the State bear the burden of persuasion on the question of prejudice? [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm
State, 46 So. 3d 1181, 1183 (Fla.2d DCA 2010) (citing State v. [read post]
