Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 3261 - 3280 of 9,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2018, 8:43 am by Eugene Volokh
The Illinlois Supreme Court had already held that the Second Amendment protects a right to carry guns in most public places, and in today's People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:27 pm
In that context among the most important questions for law revolve around the extent and character of the evolution of CPC thinking, and the CPC Basic Line, with respect to Socialist Rule of Law and Socialist Constitutionalism now bound up in the adoption of “Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am by ISAAC RICHARDSON
Provided the territory is ‘fundamentally different’, the UK will no longer be bound with respect to it. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am by ISAAC RICHARDSON
The decisions so far On the first issue, the courts below were necessarily bound by the principle espoused by the House of Lords in R v Bancoult (no 2) [2009] 1 AC 453: that declarations of application attach not to the land which is contained in the territory of the signatory state, but instead to the ‘political entities’ about which the declaration is made; with the result that a declaration lapses whenever a ‘new political entity’ is formed. [read post]