Search for: "Bui v. State"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 9,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
American Traffic Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:00 am
Burke Engineering, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:20 pm
Carpenter Technology Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:34 am
Here, in Wo Yee Hing Realty Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
The Oklahoma Supreme Court released Harris v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:03 pm
A recent case, Bragg v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:55 pm
This WSJ article covers the upcoming Supreme Court preemption case Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
Nicholson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:28 am
In Green v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 2:41 am
Here, in Wo Yee Hing Realty Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:59 pm
Lesniak v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:26 am
Fricke Memorials, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 3:52 am
Gaines v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 9:11 am
A federal court didn't buy that contention, in part because when the state Democratic Party and the American Civil Liberties Union sued to overturn the law, they did not name anyone who was rejected at the ballot box for lack of an ID. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:15 am
Several years ago the Court resolved part of it: In Quality King v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:13 am
Prematurely, it turns out; last year the 4th District reversed the grant of the suppression in State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 3:02 pm
In Landry v. [read post]
