Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 3261 - 3280 of 14,928
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2020, 1:46 pm by Amy Howe
She prepares a summary, known as a syllabus, of each opinion; she also edits the opinions and oversees the process of publishing them in the United States Reports. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
Beginning with the passage of the 1933 Securities Act, Congress has required an Independent Audit for every public listed company in the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
SCBA, the largest body armor company in the United States, had an exclusive relationship with Toyobo, which was based in Japan. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
 The Data Protection elements of the case concerned the provision of information from the United Kingdom to the United States to allow for such a trial to take place and the qualification of some of that information as personal data. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
When the case came to the appeals court and was heard by Justice Johnson, he changed the allocation to Spain and Portugal and decided sixteen slaves should be freed to the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), analyzed the challenges that FDA faced in controlling the explosive growth of e-cigarette use among youth in the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 12:16 pm by Stephen Wermiel
When votes were recorded in those cases, they were 5-4 in favor of the states, with Chief Justice John Roberts voting with the four liberal justices. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  Justice Dillon noted that allegations of adultery present unique issues of proof. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:14 am by Legal Profession Prof
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has affirmed the denial of a motion for new trial and an evidentiary hearing sought by a former chief justice of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals After the... [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 6:01 am by Dan Maurer
The Blurred Lines Objection The United States must avoid actions that “blur” the line between civilian and military—a division as critical to American democratic freedom as the separation between church and state. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 2:03 pm by Matt Gluck
The Congressional Innovation Scholars Program JOB DESCRIPTION The Congressional Innovation Scholars fellowship program will place you among the top tech decision makers in the United States government at a time when technology is reshaping society in fundamental ways. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 2:50 am by Deb Givens
  The states could ask that their lawsuit be consolidated with one filed by the Justice Department in October. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 3:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Mehta and Vermeule conclude: As chief justice of the United States, Roberts's solicitude for the reputation of both the court he leads and the entire branch of government of which he is the figurative head is understandable. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 1:41 pm by Dani Selby
“Caste” by Isabel Wilkerson In this non-fiction work, Isabel Wilkerson, a Pulitzer prize-winning journalist and author, examines systemic inequality in the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 10:30 am by Anna Salvatore
” They talked about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit, the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:54 am by Howard Bashman
Plus, if you are a leading appellate lawyer, one of the first law professor blogs, or the Chief Justice of the United States, perhaps I gave you a shout-out in the episode. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 9:53 am by Charles Kotuby
Chief Justice John Roberts pressed the United States on why it “has scrupulously avoided taking a position” on what the courts should do in the Simon case on whether abstention is warranted, suggesting that the executive branch is expecting the courts to do the difficult and sensitive work that comity abstention requires. [read post]